environmental issues
How much taxpayer money should a foreign oil company get just for building a refinery in the USA?
New Shell Plant Brings Pollution and Plastic. We’re Fighting Back. Photo above – Shell’s new ethane refinery in Pennsylvania. How much taxpayer money would you serve up, to keep this dusk to dawn glow on the horizon? Good news, everybody.... Hot take: Greenland's Masterstroke. Greenland agrees to voluntarily join the United States on the condition of immediate statehood. It then uses that leverage to push the US government towards more sane governance, including the impeachment of Donald Trump, the reinstatement and strengthening of institutional guardrails, and the repair of ties with the EU. Once those objectives are achieved, Greenland then secedes, gaining full independence with the consent of a future US administration.
This is making an amazing amount of asdumptions the first being Greenlanders hate Trump as youbseem to do. However bite the hand that feeds you? Given a deal of royalties based on the rare earth minerals mined? On top of that good paying jobs paying over the cost of living?... Incorruptible Organizations AMA with Eric Ries. Wednesday 2/4 at 3:00 PM CT
Lean Startup author who now focuses on legal structures to protect mission-driven organizations from corruption. incorruptible.co
Free book giveaway! Register here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNfb54LuzwI& in a tiny (28M) country like mine (so-called-'Australia'), it's still leading to new fossil fuel mines being approved on the regs 😬 Would love for more folks to wise up about the standardised level of corruption present & normalised in both major parties of our government... "You know, there are 13 ways of doing anything. 11 of them will work. Just pick one and do it.”. Dennis Hightower, who at the time was head of Disney International.
https://www.nfx.com/post/9-habits-world-class-startupsHe asked me why I wasn’t doing something, and I responded by explaining the pros and cons of two different ways of doing it. Thoughtfully, he replied “You know, there are 13 ways of doing anything. 11 of them will work. Just pick one and do it.”
The best Founders avoid over-analyzing. At a startup, you don’t have time — and the result will most likely be marginal. Pick a way and do it. Be consistently decisive.mmm yes so cool. feels a lot like making a relationship "last" without asking if it's good. like one thing I trust you with for UpTrust is that pollution is gonna be at an all-time low, I just can feel that in my bones, and I think that priority might BE the thing the entire... What more do you want seeing in the world
Jordan just asked "What do you want to see more of in the world". Here’s my quick response: Want the change makers in the world, the people who are interested and engaging in the world of issues, where they see a wrong and dedicate their time and resources to right those wrongs... When it comes "the global warming debate," there are often third ways that are ignored. Often the framing is
global warming
andclimate deniers
or something like that.but it seems like there are obviously multiple perspectives here, and these two black and white boxes keep us from really seeing potential solutions.
Bjorn Lomborg for example believes in man-made climate change, but also doesn’t like the alarmism. Although he cherry picks data like he accuses others of, he also I think rightfully points out lots of flaws in the arguments that help us identify solutions. Much of the hurricane damage increase over time is because we’re building bigger and more expensive houses in hurricane alleys; for this problem, we can stop building there; everybody stopping flying altogether until 2100 delays increases the increase by a few weeks, so stopping flying isn’t the solution. Often the solutions are smaller, more local, less sexy: want less polar bears to die? Increase regulation on poaching. (Polar bear populations are up over the past decade because of this, apparently). I would love to identify and popularize these solutions, so they are spoken in the same breath as
global warming
rather than it being all gloom and doom and end of the world.There are real tricky questions about what we’re trying to preserve and for whom, as well. If all we care about are humans and climate migration, then building infrastructure in places like Haiti and even evolving to coal power would be more helpful.
I like all this too, and it feels useful to switch lenses and look at what could be missing in this perspective. What jumps out at me from there is: Here’s one way I can hear the gist of this argument: "Hey everyone, yes humans destroying the earth is bad, but hey!... Finally they learned to cut off people's mics. Hot take: If the media wasn’t so Green and did this in 2016, I think Hillary would have won.
Wow the green section so far (behind time) was ridiculously short in the debate. Seems like Vance is looking at specifically energy policy. So frustrating that there is never a mention of the bigger picture....